At the American Urological Association annual practice management meeting, M. Ray Painter, MD, a practicing urologist with a strong interest in medical economic issues, and Rick Rutherford, MPE, CHA, Director of Practice Management for the American Urology Association, outlined what urology practice managers need to know to prevent succumbing to billing and coding pitfalls. They offered guidance based on Medicare standards for “incident to” services, “shared” services, office supervision requirements, time measurements for evaluation and management (E/M) coding, and red flags for auditing.
“Incident to” Services
If, after being seen by the physician who has developed a plan of care for the patient, a patient presents with a problem, the nurse practitioner (NP) or physician assistant (PA) can see the patient under the plan of care. If the treating physician is out of the office when services are provided to the patient, the care can be listed as “incident to.”
Medicare Shared Services and Office Supervision Requirements
For Medicare services that are not related to “incident to,” the physician must be in the office and face-to-face with the patient and involved in all or part of history taking, examination, or the medical decision. If a physician orders a procedure, but the physician on duty does the procedure, the physician on duty gets paid for the procedure. If the physician who performed the initial service has been actively involved in the patient’s treatment and provided supervision to the NP or PA, Medicare will pay 100% of the fee on the physician’s fee schedule. If the NP or PA provides the E/M service to a new patient or without direct personal supervision from the physician, Medicare will pay only 85% of the fee listed on the fee schedule.
Dr Painter and Mr Rutherford also outlined the hottest auditing issues:
Read Now
Stay up to date with urology news & updates by subscribing to receive the free UPM print publications or e‑Newsletters.