Subscribe

Darolutamide, New Androgen Receptor Inhibitor, Extends Metastasis-Free Survival in High-Risk Prostate Cancer

Web Exclusives - Prostate Cancer
Phoebe Starr
San Francisco, CA—Darolutamide, an investigational androgen receptor inhibitor, significantly improved metastasis-free survival in men with high-risk nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) compared with placebo in a large phase 3 clinical trial.

The median metastasis-free survival was 40.4 months with darolutamide versus 18 months with placebo (P <.0001), for a 59% reduction in metastasis or death with darolutamide. Treatment with darolutamide was superior to placebo in all the secondary end points as well.

“These results suggest that darolutamide should become a new standard of care for men with high-risk nonmetastatic CRPC,” said lead investigator Karim Fizazi, MD, PhD, Chairman, Prostate Cancer, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France, who presented the results of the ARAMIS study at the 2019 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.

The results were simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine.1

In addition to the metastasis-free survival benefit, “Patients treated with darolutamide had delayed pain progression and similar quality of life compared with placebo. No clinically relevant differences in safety were seen between the 2 groups during the treatment period,” Dr Fizazi noted.

The 2 androgen receptor inhibitors enzalutamide (Xtandi) and apalutamide (Erleada) are FDA approved for the treatment of patients with nonmetastatic CRPC. Unlike these drugs, darolutamide does not cross the blood–brain barrier and has lower potential for central nervous system (CNS) side effects, including seizures, falls, and cognitive impairment. By contrast, enzalutamide and apalutamide are associated with these CNS effects.

The ARAMIS Clinical Trial

The international phase 3 ARAMIS clinical trial included 1509 patients who were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to darolutamide 600 mg twice daily or to placebo. All patients were receiving background androgen-deprivation therapy. Treatment with darolutamide or with placebo continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of patient consent.

At baseline, the median prostate-­specific antigen (PSA) doubling time was 4.5 months. The median follow-up for this first primary analysis of the study was 17.9 months. The median duration of treatment was 14.8 months with darolutamide versus 11 months with placebo.

In a subgroup analysis, metastasis-free survival was superior with darolutamide versus placebo in all subgroups, regardless of PSA doubling time at less than 6 months or at more than 6 months; use of bone-targeted therapy; PSA level at baseline; Gleason score; age; or geographic region.

An interim analysis showed that the median overall survival was not reached in either group. The 3-year survival rate was 83% with darolutamide compared with 73% with placebo.

Darolutamide was associated with a 35% improvement in time to pain progression versus placebo (P <.0001). The median time to pain progression was 40.3 months with darolutamide versus 25.4 months with placebo.

Patients who received darolutamide treatment also had a 62% improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo (P <.0001). The median PFS was 36.8 months with darolutamide versus 14.8 months with placebo.

Patient-reported quality of life was similar between the 2 arms on the Brief Pain Inventory Short-Form; the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-­Prostate for physical and emotional well-being; and the Euro­pean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for prostate cancer urinary symptom subscale.

Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were rare. The treatment discontinuation rate because of adverse events was similar between the groups—8.9% with darolutamide and 8.7% with placebo. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the 2 arms, except for more fatigue reported with darolutamide.

Darolutamide treatment did increase CNS events compared with placebo, but at a lower rate than seen with currently available androgen receptor inhibitors. The incidence of seizure was 0.2% in both groups.

Commenting on this study, Ian D. Davis, MBBS, PhD, FRACP, ­FAChPM, Head, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Victoria, Australia, said, “The question of whether ARAMIS should change practice is open. Toxicity seems acceptable, but we have no information on the effects of subsequent treatment or on cost-­effectiveness.”

Reference

  1. Fizazi K, Shore N, Tammela TL, et al; for the ARAMIS investigators. Darolutamide in nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1235-1246.
Related Items
Paradigm Shift: Radiation a New Standard in Prostate Cancer with Low Metastatic Burden
Web Exclusives published on January 29, 2019 in Prostate Cancer
With Access to Care, Black Men in the United States Have Same Prostate Cancer Outcomes as White Men
Web Exclusives published on December 4, 2018 in Prostate Cancer
Updated NCCN Prostate Cancer Guideline Emphasizes Risk Stratification
Wayne Kuznar
Web Exclusives published on September 28, 2018 in Prostate Cancer
Adding Abiraterone to ADT May Decrease Resource Utilization in Castration-Naïve Prostate Cancer
Wayne Kuznar
Web Exclusives published on July 24, 2018 in Prostate Cancer
Apalutamide and Enzalutamide Each Delays Prostate Cancer Metastasis by Approximately 2 Years
Web Exclusives published on May 31, 2018 in Prostate Cancer
Abiraterone Is Game-Changer in the Frontline Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Wayne Kuznar
Web Exclusives published on July 21, 2017 in Prostate Cancer
Adding Antiandrogen Therapy to Radiation Improves Survival in Recurrent Prostate Cancer—A New Standard of Care?
Jessica Miller
Web Exclusives published on May 15, 2017 in Prostate Cancer
Rise in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Has Screening, Treatment Implications
Charles Bankhead
Urology Practice Management - December 2016, Vol 5, No 6 published on December 7, 2016 in Prostate Cancer
Promising Antitumor Activity of ODM-201 in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Wayne Kuznar
Urology Practice Management - December 2016, Vol 5, No 6 published on December 7, 2016 in Prostate Cancer
Is the Glass Half Empty or Half Full? First Study Compares Robotic-Assisted Surgery and Open Radical Prostatectomy
Alice Goodman
Urology Practice Management - December 2016, Vol 5, No 6 published on December 7, 2016 in Prostate Cancer
Last modified: June 3, 2019
  • American Health and Drug Benefits
  • Association for Value Based Cancer Care
  • Lynx CME
  • Oncology Practice Management
  • Rheumatology Practice Management

Search