Subscribe

Atezolizumab Could Be Start of “Seismic Shift” in Metastatic Bladder Cancer Therapy

Urology Practice Management - August 2016, Vol 5, No 4 - Bladder Cancer
Wayne Kuznar

Atezolizumab (Tecentriq) shows promise as primary therapy in patients with cisplatin-ineligible, locally advanced metastatic urothelial (bladder) cancer, according to data from the IMvigor210 study presented at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting.

Preliminary results also showed encouraging overall survival data, said Arjun V. Balar, MD, Co-Leader of the Genitourinary Cancers Program, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, who presented the results.

“I think these data make a compelling argument for atezolizumab to be a potential new standard of care in patients with cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial cancer. Moreover, it could represent the beginning of a seismic shift in our treatment approach for all patients with metastatic disease, irrespective of their eligibility for cisplatin,” Dr Balar said.

Atezolizumab was approved in May 2016 for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer that progressed during or after platinum-containing chemotherapy.

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is currently the standard of care in the first-line setting, but many patients with metastatic bladder cancer are ineligible for cisplatin therapy because of a poor performance status or an impaired renal function; therefore, these patients receive non–cisplatin-based regimens or best supportive care, according to Dr Balar. However, response durations are short with these regimens.

Atezolizumab Improves Response Rates

Atezolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets PD ligand 1 (PD-L1). By inhibiting its interactions with PD-1 and B7.1 receptors, “it can reinvigorate exhausted T-cells and unleash antitumor immunity,” Dr Balar said.

Cohort 1 of the IMvigor210 study included 119 cisplatin-ineligible, chemotherapy-naïve patients (median age, 73 years) with metastatic disease. The bladder (or urethra) was the primary tumor site in 71% of the patients, and 66% had metastatic disease at visceral sites. Renal impairment was the most common contraindication to cisplatin. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was given intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression.

At the time of data cutoff in March 2016, 98 patients discontinued treatment, with disease progression being the most common (75 patients) reason.

At a median duration follow-up of 14.4 months, the objective response rate was 24%, and 7% of the patients achieved a complete response. Similar responses were observed when response rates were stratified by PD-L1 expression.

In the subgroup of patients whose tumors underexpressed PD-L1, the overall response rate was 21% and the complete response rate was 8%. “Across the board, we see complete responses in all IC [immune-cell] subgroups. Activity of this level in this patient population is unprecedented,” said Dr Balar.

“Responses were rapid, at a median time of 2.1 months,…and they are durable,” he added. The median duration of response was not yet reached in any PD-L1 subgroup, and 75% of the responses are ongoing.

Tumor regression was observed across all immune-cell subgroups. The estimated median overall survival for the entire study population was 14.8 months, and the estimated 12-month survival rate was 57%.

Atezolizumab was generally well-tolerated–only 6% of patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. Treatment-related all-grade and grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 66% and 15% of patients, respectively. One patient died from sepsis.

Related Items
Updated NCCN Prostate Cancer Guideline Emphasizes Risk Stratification
Wayne Kuznar
Urology Practice Management - Web Exclusives published on September 28, 2018 in Prostate Cancer
Adding Abiraterone to ADT May Decrease Resource Utilization in Castration-Naïve Prostate Cancer
Wayne Kuznar
Urology Practice Management - Web Exclusives published on July 24, 2018 in Prostate Cancer
Treat Your Patients as Customers by Meeting Their Expectations
Wayne Kuznar
Rheumatology Practice Management April 2018 Vol 6 No 2 published on April 16, 2018 in NORM Conference News
2017 HIPAA Updates and the Office for Civil Rights Audits
Wayne Kuznar
Rheumatology Practice Management October 2017 Vol 5 No 5 published on October 20, 2017 in NORM News
Abiraterone Is Game-Changer in the Frontline Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Wayne Kuznar
Urology Practice Management - Web Exclusives published on July 21, 2017 in Prostate Cancer
Promising Antitumor Activity of ODM-201 in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Wayne Kuznar
Urology Practice Management - December 2016, Vol 5, No 6 published on December 7, 2016 in Prostate Cancer
IsoPSA, a New Biomarker Test, Differentiates High- and Low-Grade Prostate Cancer, Improves Diagnostic Accuracy
Wayne Kuznar
Urology Practice Management - October 2016, Vol 5, No 5 published on October 10, 2016 in Prostate Cancer
Testosterone Replacement Does Not Increase Risk for Prostate Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease
Wayne Kuznar
Urology Practice Management - June 2016, Vol 5, No 3 published on June 20, 2016 in AUA Meeting Highlights
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy May Provide Benefit in Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer
Phoebe Starr
Urology Practice Management - June 2016, Vol 5, No 3 published on June 20, 2016 in Bladder Cancer
Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts May Help to Personalize Bladder Cancer Treatment
Laura Morgan
Urology Practice Management - December 2015, Vol 4, No 6 published on December 28, 2015 in Bladder Cancer
Last modified: August 22, 2016
  • American Health and Drug Benefits
  • Association for Value Based Cancer Care
  • Lynx CME
  • Oncology Practice Management
  • Rheumatology Practice Management

Search